tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2478651523484357162.post391291450194114389..comments2023-10-06T04:25:50.651-07:00Comments on congamike on stocks: Cabella's in a bullish trendUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2478651523484357162.post-77479845183678377992009-02-14T05:14:00.000-08:002009-02-14T05:14:00.000-08:00mike, Sorry for any confusion on my part. What I d...mike, <BR/>Sorry for any confusion on my part. <BR/>What I did when reading this post was jump to ST w/o signing in (cuz I just logged out) and used their default BB 20/2, MACD 12/26, STOCH 5/1 are the settings, I think, and was at 2 yr daily. I figured that would suffice. The 32 sma came from your comment of a 32 day bull. and was just being creative. So 20, 50, or 32 sma are all converging in that same area.<BR/>I was just getting a quick glance at this CAB thing. And have to say this looks better than other recommendations I've seen recently.<BR/><BR/>If you ever have the time, I'd really like to see the lines/indicators/graph that make the slingshot divergence.<BR/><BR/>Excellent work here, mike. You really impress me with your breadth of stocks.km703https://www.blogger.com/profile/03090075129869645251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2478651523484357162.post-79230895942191674802009-02-13T21:41:00.000-08:002009-02-13T21:41:00.000-08:00Huh? I'm not really sure what u are saying here.OK...Huh? I'm not really sure what u are saying here.<BR/><BR/>OK. I understand the 12/26 MACD, but I use different settings, close to the ones recommended by the pros at FreeTradingVideos.com. Those settings show that we are a bit above the zero. Further, there is a HUGE slingshot divergence on the weekly chart.<BR/><BR/>My BBand setting are as John Bollinger recommends, 20,2 which are expanding (yay!) to make room for future growth (Ye-freaking-Haw!).<BR/><BR/>I do not understand your stochastics setting, or Ri/Re. I have never used a 32 day sma (only watch 20 and 50 sma's). Teach me please?<BR/><BR/>KM, you do make a good point, This will not be a prominent and long term position for me. I simply hope to generate some fast (until most of the shorts are covered) profits that might be compounded in my ETF mainstays once (eventually) they are ripe for investment. It's just so good that I can't resist being involved.congamikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05026617223991819413noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2478651523484357162.post-10938374451784437272009-02-13T15:30:00.000-08:002009-02-13T15:30:00.000-08:00I do like what I see there from the 2 year. Money ...I do like what I see there from the 2 year. Money flow is good, it is bouncing on top BB, no real biggie. But what catches my eye is the bounce of the 50/ 25 fast, slow stochs respectively. 32 day sma in the right place.<BR/>Is the macd 12/26 actually over zero there?<BR/>Ri/Re, would set stop @ 4.29.km703https://www.blogger.com/profile/03090075129869645251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2478651523484357162.post-13981226734672245142009-02-13T15:04:00.000-08:002009-02-13T15:04:00.000-08:00mike, you're all over the show. I don't know how y...mike, you're all over the show. I don't know how you keep track of it all. I could never do it. <BR/>Between the financials and handful ETF, I'm swamped!<BR/>Will look at this data and post response.km703https://www.blogger.com/profile/03090075129869645251noreply@blogger.com